<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>I, Engineer &#187; Leading projects</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.unreasonable.com/category/leading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.unreasonable.com</link>
	<description>engineering is a way of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 02:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Clever Hans</title>
		<link>https://blog.unreasonable.com/clever-hans/</link>
		<comments>https://blog.unreasonable.com/clever-hans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 17:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lubkin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leading projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LLNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obituary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unreasonable.com/?p=326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hans R. Bruijnes Hans R. Bruijnes of Livermore died peacefully on February 12, 2014 from complications of congestive heart failure.&#160;&#160;More Physicist John Killeen was director of the National Magnetic Fusion Energy Computer Center (NMFECC) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, but deputy director Hans Bruijnes was our day-to-day boss. The morning... <a href="https://blog.unreasonable.com/clever-hans/" class="readmore">Read more</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<aside class="postimage"><a href="http://www.independentnews.com/obituaries/article_d607efb8-9a45-11e3-99ad-001a4bcf887a.html"><img src="http://blog.unreasonable.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/hans-bruijnes.jpg" width="281" height="405" title="Hans R. Bruijnes (1927-2014)" /></a></p>
<h2>Hans R. Bruijnes</h2>
<p>Hans R. Bruijnes of Livermore died peacefully on February 12, 2014 from complications of congestive heart failure.&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://www.independentnews.com/obituaries/article_d607efb8-9a45-11e3-99ad-001a4bcf887a.html" title="Hans R. Bruijnes (1927-2014)">More</a></p>
</aside>
<section>Physicist John Killeen was director of the <a href="https://www.nersc.gov/" title="Now known as the National Energy Research Computer Center (NERSC)">National Magnetic Fusion Energy Computer Center (NMFECC)</a> at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, but deputy director Hans Bruijnes was our day-to-day boss.</p>
<p>The morning would almost always start with a Hans-led all-hands meeting. It usually felt like a waste of time. But he believed in it. We should come together every day as a team, and all know what everyone was working on and what the key issues were.</p>
<p>Hans was a great practitioner of management by walking around, long before it became popular. He&#8217;d randomly stop by your office, ask what you were up to. Occasionally confusing matters by telling you to do X when your group leader had told you to do Y. Eminently mockable, but always with affection and respect.</p>
<p>I wish I&#8217;d known all the backstory in his obit when I&#8217;d see him every day. Find a long lunch at the <a href="http://www.concannonvineyard.com/">Concannon winery</a> to hear his version.</p>
<p>A good man, who will be missed by anyone who knew him.<br />
</section>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.unreasonable.com/clever-hans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flying in close formation</title>
		<link>https://blog.unreasonable.com/flying-in-close-formation/</link>
		<comments>https://blog.unreasonable.com/flying-in-close-formation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lubkin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leading projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unreasonable.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you&#8217;re over Mount Rainier, you want your pilot flying an airplane, not 100,000 parts in close formation. Companies don&#8217;t ship software. They ship products. (Or deliver services. Same thing.) A product has (at least) code, test code, graphics, documentation, training, customer support, marketing, sales, advertising, technical marketing, HR, maintenance,... <a href="https://blog.unreasonable.com/flying-in-close-formation/" class="readmore">Read more</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<aside class="postimage"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/62/Boeing_767_over_Mount_Rainier%2C_circa_1980s.jpg/320px-Boeing_767_over_Mount_Rainier%2C_circa_1980s.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="216" /></aside>
<section>When you&#8217;re over Mount Rainier, you want your pilot flying an airplane, not 100,000 parts in close formation.</p>
<p>Companies don&#8217;t ship software. They ship products. (Or deliver services. Same thing.)</p>
<p>A product has (at least) code, test code, graphics, documentation, training, customer support, marketing, sales, advertising, technical marketing, HR, maintenance, legal, accounting, other products it needs to work with, and a bevy of external partners—alpha and beta participants, investors, administrators, recruiters, third-party developers, book authors, industry writers, competitive partners, customers, and end-users.</p>
<p>And you succeed if the <em>entire product</em> succeeds. Not just your corner of it.<span id="more-13"></span></p>
<p>As a project lead, you will most often meet with your peers and direct reports. But you need to know and have a good working relationship with people in each of the roles in the extended team. Your work feeds into theirs and vice versa.</p>
<p>Be sure they have a say in what will be committed to when. <em>And that they feel they have.</em></p>
<p>Ask how your development team&#8217;s ideas impact them. That easy whizbang you want to add at the last minute may be an afternoon&#8217;s work for one of your software engineers. But it&#8217;s an eng-month for an affected group.</p>
<p>Be open to ideas from any one of them. They may not use the correct terms. What they suggest may reflect a misunderstanding. It&#8217;s still worth your time and part of the job.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not lead, this should matter to you too. If you don&#8217;t want the endeavor to be successful, why are you working on it?</p>
</section>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.unreasonable.com/flying-in-close-formation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Writing bad checks</title>
		<link>https://blog.unreasonable.com/writing-bad-checks/</link>
		<comments>https://blog.unreasonable.com/writing-bad-checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lubkin]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Leading projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.unreasonable.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t write checks on someone else&#8217;s account. One of the quickest ways to damage a relationship is to commit someone else to a task or a deadline without discussing it with them first. Whether it&#8217;s promising your spouse will chaperone a field trip, the assault team can rescue the hostages,... <a href="https://blog.unreasonable.com/writing-bad-checks/" class="readmore">Read more</a>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Don&#8217;t write checks on someone else&#8217;s account.</strong></p>
<p>One of the quickest ways to damage a relationship is to commit someone else to a task or a deadline without discussing it with them first. Whether it&#8217;s promising your spouse will chaperone a field trip, the assault team can rescue the hostages, or the spacecraft is go for launch.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t commit to yes. You need to discuss it with the team. Do commit to that and to when you&#8217;ll be back with an answer.</p>
<p>It may ultimately be your decision. But everyone appreciates being consulted and resents being ordered. Be a leader, not a boss. Plus there might be a fundamental reason why what was asked for simply can&#8217;t be done, period. That they&#8217;d tell you if you ask.</p>
<p>Of course, you also need to be someone they feel safe to tell the truth to, and want to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.unreasonable.com/writing-bad-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
